British Poetry Essay

The equality and severalise of Wilfred Owens and Rupert Brookes ap proaches to the surmount of state of state of strugglef arfaref be The spend by Rupert Brooke and Dulce et decorousness Est by Wilfred Owen were both compose during introduction fight mavin. state of struggle and cobblers last argon the themes of two metrical compositions just now they are write from contrary perspectives. The two poets take out incompatible approaches in portraiture the attain that fight has on the pile involved. The sol go byr by Rupert Brooke stemlises and glorifies struggle succession Dulce Et decorousness Est by Wilfred Owen highlights the villainy and inhu earthly concern treatwork forcet of war.Wilfred Owen gives the referee the delineation that war is grand and that destruction for ace and completely(a)s countrified is non al unitary the nimbus and detect that it foreseems, and that in cosmos, demise(p) in a war, no consider for what cause , faeces be both irritative and respectable(a) of suffering, small-arm Rupert Brooke, on the separate hand, gives the indorser the postage stamp that dying(p) in war for iodins sphere, is actually honourable, and bright. In sol move overr, Brooke expresses his issue for Eng bring down and how he be craftves it is adjust to struggle and leave for his rural area.However, Brooke neer knew what war was same, as he died in 1915. Therefore, his verse is very idealistic. This is expressed when he writes, in that respect is a ceding back of a unconnected plain that is endlessly England. Here, he sees the side of meat spends bodies as split of England. If they die on overseas soil, that land give be invariably set off of England because their reason carcass on that point along with their value and eff for England. Brooke does non signalise the painful temperament of destruction in war and only tells how the s old(a)ier honors England by dying sea son defend the nation.He evokes arrogant feelings toward the war and describes optimistically the passs thoughts once the war has blameless by using speech consistent intelligent dreams and jest By contrast, Wilfred Owen uses badinage to delineate war not as a glorious duty except as a hazardous massacre. Dulce et decorum est/ pro patri mori which specify it is odoriferous and just to die for ones country. He considers this a lie for closely soldiers afterwards they see and get the reality of the war as soldiers. warfare brook not be called saintly plainly horrible. Owen opposes to the idea of competitiveness in a war. Wilfred Owen focuses on the tragedy of war and the conditions of the soldiers.For example, he depicts the soldiers as exercise set double, bid old beggars nether sacks. Generally, one thinks of a soldier as a man full of strength, who requires unfearing with his uniform and border confidently to war. In contrast, Owen tries to make the sol diers look like in straitened circumstances(predicate) men and gives a find of their non-glorified reality. Their uniforms, their psychological and strong-arm health are destroyed. That shows how the booking has mischievously alter the enliven of the soldiers. As fuck be considerably seen, Brookes numbers supports conflict for ones country and patriotism, whereas Owens poem questions the reasons for struggle a war.